Coverage

We have created an initial list of test cases. The tests in the tests/api directory test Items via the API. But how do we know whether these tests comprehensively test our code? This is where code coverage comes into play.

Tools that measure code coverage observe your code while a test suite is running and record which lines are passed and which are not. This measure – known as line coverage – is calculated by dividing the total number of executed lines by the total number of lines of code. Code coverage tools can also tell you whether all paths in control statements are traversed, a measurement known as branch coverage.

However, code coverage cannot tell you if your test suite is good; it can only tell you how much of the application code is being traversed by your test suite.

Coverage.py is the favourite Python tool that measures code coverage. And pytest-cov is a popular pytest plugin that is often used in conjunction with Coverage.py.

Using Coverage.py with pytest-cov

Both Coverage.py and pytest-cov are third-party packages that must be installed before use:

You can create a report for the test coverage with Coverage.py.

$ bin/python -m pip install coverage pytest-cov
C:> Scripts\python -m pip install coverage pytest-cov

Note

If you want to determine the test coverage for Python 2 and Python<3.6, you must use Coverage<6.0.

To run tests with Coverage.py, you need to add the --cov option and specify either a path to the code you want to measure or the installed package you are testing. In our case, the Items project is an installed package, so we will test it with --cov=items.

The normal pytest output is followed by the coverage report, as shown here:

$ cd /PATH/TO/items
$ python3 -m venv .
$ . bin/activate
$ python -m pip install ".[dev]"
$ pytest --cov=items
============================= test session starts ==============================
...
rootdir: /Users/veit/cusy/prj/items
configfile: pyproject.toml
testpaths: tests
plugins: cov-4.1.0, Faker-19.11.0
collected 35 items

tests/api/test_add.py ....                                               [ 11%]
tests/api/test_config.py .                                               [ 14%]
tests/api/test_count.py ...                                              [ 22%]
tests/api/test_delete.py ...                                             [ 31%]
tests/api/test_finish.py ....                                            [ 42%]
tests/api/test_list.py .........                                         [ 68%]
tests/api/test_start.py ....                                             [ 80%]
tests/api/test_update.py ....                                            [ 91%]
tests/api/test_version.py .                                              [ 94%]
tests/cli/test_add.py ..                                                 [100%]

---------- coverage: platform darwin, python 3.11.5-final-0 ----------
Name                    Stmts   Miss  Cover
-------------------------------------------
src/items/__init__.py       3      0   100%
src/items/api.py           70      1    99%
src/items/cli.py           38      9    76%
src/items/db.py            23      0   100%
-------------------------------------------
TOTAL                     134     10    93%


============================== 35 passed in 0.11s ==============================

The previous output was generated by coverage’s reporting functions, although we did not call coverage directly. pytest --cov=items instructed the pytest-cov plugin to

  • set coverage to items with --source while running pytest with the tests

  • execute coverage report for the line coverage report

Without pytest-cov, the commands would look like this:

$ coverage run --source=items -m pytest
$ coverage report

The files __init__.py and db.py have a coverage of 100%, which means that our test suite hits every line in these files. However, this does not tell us that it is sufficiently tested or that the tests detect possible errors; but it at least tells us that every line was executed during the test suite.

The cli.py file has a coverage of 76%. This may seem surprisingly high as we have not tested the CLI at all. However, this is due to the fact that cli.py is imported by __init__.py, so that all function definitions are executed, but none of the function contents.

However, we are really interested in the api.py file with 99% test coverage. We can find out what was missed by re-running the tests and adding the --cov-report=term-missing option:

pytest --cov=items --cov-report=term-missing
============================= test session starts ==============================
...
rootdir: /Users/veit/cusy/prj/items
configfile: pyproject.toml
testpaths: tests
plugins: cov-4.1.0, Faker-19.11.0
collected 35 items

tests/api/test_add.py ....                                               [ 11%]
tests/api/test_config.py .                                               [ 14%]
tests/api/test_count.py ...                                              [ 22%]
tests/api/test_delete.py ...                                             [ 31%]
tests/api/test_finish.py ....                                            [ 42%]
tests/api/test_list.py .........                                         [ 68%]
tests/api/test_start.py ....                                             [ 80%]
tests/api/test_update.py ....                                            [ 91%]
tests/api/test_version.py .                                              [ 94%]
tests/cli/test_add.py ..                                                 [100%]

---------- coverage: platform darwin, python 3.11.5-final-0 ----------
Name                    Stmts   Miss  Cover   Missing
-----------------------------------------------------
src/items/__init__.py       3      0   100%
src/items/api.py           68      1    99%   52
src/items/cli.py           38      9    76%   18-19, 25, 39-43, 51
src/items/db.py            23      0   100%
-----------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                     132     10    92%


============================== 35 passed in 0.11s ==============================

Now that we have the line numbers of the untested lines, we can open the files in an editor and view the missing lines. However, it is easier to look at the HTML report.

Generate HTML reports

With Coverage.py we can generate HTML reports to view the coverage data in more detail. The report is generated either with the option --cov-report=html or by executing coverage html after a previous coverage run:

$ cd /PATH/TO/items
$ python3 -m venv .
$ . bin/activate
$ python -m pip install ".[dev]"
$ pytest --cov=items --cov-report=html

Both commands will prompt Coverage.py to create an HTML report in the htmlcov/ directory. Open htmlcov/index.html with a browser and you should see the following:

Coverage report: 92%

If you click on the src/items/api.py: file, a report for this file is displayed:

Coverage for src/items/api.py: 99%

The upper part of the report shows the percentage of rows covered (99%), the total number of statements (68) and how many statements were executed (67), missed (1) and excluded (0). Click on missing to highlight the rows that were not executed:

raise MissingSummary

It looks like the function add_item() has an exception MissingSummary, which is not tested yet.

Exclude code from test coverage

In the HTML reports you will find a column with the specification 0 excluded. This refers to a function of Coverage.py that allows us to exclude some lines from the check. We do not exclude anything in items. However, it is not uncommon for some lines of code to be excluded from the test coverage calculation, for example modules that are to be both imported and executed directly may contain a block that looks something like this:

if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

This command tells Python to execute main() when we call the module directly with python my_module.py, but not to execute the code when the module is imported. These types of code blocks are often excluded from testing with a simple pragma statement:

if __name__ == "__main__":  # pragma: no cover
    main()

This instructs Coverage.py to exclude either a single line or a block of code. If, as in this case, the pragma is in the if statement, you do not have to insert it into both lines of code.

Alternatively, this can also be configured for all occurrences:

[run]
branch = True

[report]
; Regexes for lines to exclude from consideration
exclude_also =

    ; Don’t complain if tests don’t hit defensive assertion code:
    raise AssertionError
    raise NotImplementedError

    ; Don't complain if non-runnable code isn’t run:
    if __name__ == .__main__.:

ignore_errors = True

[html]
directory = coverage_html_report
[tool.coverage.run]
branch = true

[tool.coverage.report]
# Regexes for lines to exclude from consideration
exclude_also = [
    # Don’t complain if tests don’t hit defensive assertion code:
    "raise AssertionError",
    "raise NotImplementedError",

    # Don’t complain if non-runnable code isn’t run:
    "if __name__ == .__main__.:",
    ]

ignore_errors = true

[tool.coverage.html]
directory = "coverage_html_report"
[coverage:run]
branch = True

[coverage:report]
; Regexes for lines to exclude from consideration
exclude_also =

    ; Don’t complain if tests don’t hit defensive assertion code:
    raise AssertionError
    raise NotImplementedError

    ; Don’t complain if non-runnable code isn’t run:
    if __name__ == .__main__.:

ignore_errors = True

[coverage:html]
directory = coverage_html_report

Extensions

In Coverage.py plugins you will also find a number of extensions for Coverage.

Test coverage of all tests with GitHub actions

After you have checked the test coverage, you can upload the files as GitHub actions, for example in a ci.yaml as artefacts, so that you can reuse them later in other jobs:

45      - name: Upload coverage data
46        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
47        with:
48          name: coverage-data
49          path: .coverage.*
50          include-hidden-files: true
51          if-no-files-found: ignore
include-hidden-files

has become necessary with actions/upload-artifact v4.4.0.

if-no-files-found: ignore

is useful if you don’t want to measure the test coverage for all Python versions in order to get results faster. You should therefore only upload the data for those elements of your matrix that you want to take into account.

After all the tests have been run, you can define another job that summarises the results:

53  coverage:
54    name: Combine and check coverage
55    needs: tests
56    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
57    steps:
58      - name: Check out the repo
59        uses: actions/checkout@v4
60
61      - name: Set up Python
62        uses: actions/setup-python@v5
63        with:
64          python-version: 3.12
65
66      - name: Install dependencies
67        run: |
68          python -m pip install --upgrade coverage[toml]
69
70      - name: Download coverage data
71        uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
72        with:
73          name: coverage-data
74
75      - name: Combine coverage and fail it it’s under 100 %
76        run: |
77          python -m coverage combine
78          python -m coverage html --skip-covered --skip-empty
79
80          # Report and write to summary.
81          python -m coverage report | sed 's/^/    /' >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
82
83          # Report again and fail if under 100%.
84          python -Im coverage report --fail-under=100
85
86      - name: Upload HTML report if check failed
87        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
88        with:
89          name: html-report
90          path: htmlcov
91        if: ${{ failure() }}
needs: tests

ensures that all tests are performed. If your job that runs the tests has a different name, you will need to change it here.

name: "Download coverage data"

downloads the test coverage data that was previously uploaded with name: "Upload coverage data".

name: "Combine coverage and fail it it’s under 100 %"

combines the test coverage and creates an HTML report if the condition --fail-under=100 is met.

Once the workflow is complete, you can download the HTML report under YOUR_REPO ‣ Actions ‣ tests ‣ Combine and check coverage.

Badge

You can use GitHub Actions to create a badge with your code coverage. A GitHub Gist is also required to store the parameters for the badge, which is rendered by shields.io. To do this, we extend our ci.yaml as follows:

 93      - name: Create badge
 94        uses: schneegans/dynamic-badges-action@v1.7.0
 95        with:
 96          auth: ${{ secrets.GIST_TOKEN }}
 97          gistID: YOUR_GIST_ID
 98          filename: covbadge.json
 99          label: Coverage
100          message: ${{ env.total }}%
101          minColorRange: 50
102          maxColorRange: 90
103          valColorRange: ${{ env.total }}
Line 97

GIST_TOKEN is a personal GitHub access token.

Line 98

You should replace YOUR_GIST_ID with your own Gist ID. If you don’t have a Gist ID yet, you can create one with:

  1. Call up https://gist.github.com and create a new gist, which you can name test.json, for example. The ID of the gist is the long alphanumeric part of the URL that you need here.

  2. Then go to https://github.com/settings/tokens and create a new token with the gist area.

  3. Finally, go to YOUR_REPO ‣ Settings ‣ Secrets ‣ Actions and add this token. You can give it any name you like, for example GIST_SECRET.

    If you use Dependabot to automatically update the dependencies of your repository, you must also add the GIST_SECRET in YOUR_REPO ‣ Settings ‣ Secrets ‣ Dependabot.

Lines 102-104

The badge is automatically coloured:

  • ≤ 50 % in red

  • ≥ 90 % in green

  • with a colour gradient between the two

Now the badge can be displayed with a URL like this: https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/YOUR_GITHUB_NAME/GIST_SECRET/raw/covbadge.json.

https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nedbat/a27aaed4944c1f760a969a543fb52767/raw/covbadge2_40.json https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nedbat/a27aaed4944c1f760a969a543fb52767/raw/covbadge2_45.json https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nedbat/a27aaed4944c1f760a969a543fb52767/raw/covbadge2_50.json https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nedbat/a27aaed4944c1f760a969a543fb52767/raw/covbadge2_55.json https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nedbat/a27aaed4944c1f760a969a543fb52767/raw/covbadge2_60.json https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nedbat/a27aaed4944c1f760a969a543fb52767/raw/covbadge2_65.json https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nedbat/a27aaed4944c1f760a969a543fb52767/raw/covbadge2_70.json https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nedbat/a27aaed4944c1f760a969a543fb52767/raw/covbadge2_75.json https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nedbat/a27aaed4944c1f760a969a543fb52767/raw/covbadge2_80.json https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nedbat/a27aaed4944c1f760a969a543fb52767/raw/covbadge2_85.json https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nedbat/a27aaed4944c1f760a969a543fb52767/raw/covbadge2_90.json https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nedbat/a27aaed4944c1f760a969a543fb52767/raw/covbadge2_95.json https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nedbat/a27aaed4944c1f760a969a543fb52767/raw/covbadge2_100.json